data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/455bf/455bf6bed74a0729daa368913aec5f9edda9ffec" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aff15/aff151e1775cf6257779fa5f483dd8e4bea6dba7" alt=""
Its not often in medicine that you find an encouraging note....
Dear Sir/Madam,
My name is M. from Mombasa Kenya.My wife S. was operated on at your premises in May 2010 for uterine fibroids.She was admitted and released.Her suregon was Dr.Sarah assisted by Dr.Sharon both of whom dis an excellent neat humane job and were ever ready to answer our questions.I was also very happy with the standard of care showed by your nurses among them the ever smiling Lucy,The efficent Josephine and others.Also to mention John of kitchen department who served very good food.
The hospital was also very clean and staff courteous and helpful.I would definetly recommend AIC Kijabe Hospital to my family,friends,colleagues.
Drs.Sarah & Sharon please accept my heart-felt thanks for curing my weife with God`s Help.May the healing of your hands continue to help many more people.
With Sincere Gratitude
M.
Must a Christian have the “mission call” to become a missionary? Is the mission call general and ubiquitous to Christians (the Great Commission) or specific (your tribe is the Hoaoranis in Ecuador)? How do you decide on a sending agency(geography specific, denomination specific, ministry specific)? How do you know if “the call” is really from God (It came in a clear voice) or perhaps I am feeling a well spring of emotions (I just finished a short term mission trip and can’t imagine being anywhere else but back in Africa)? Can “the call” change over time or is it life long? Should missionaries faithfully remain in one place or should a ministry have a beginning and end point at which time the missionary leaves? How can we make short term missions more effective? These are all good questions addressed in the recently published book “The Missionary Call” by David Sills.
I wanted to like this book. And it seemed like I ought to like this book, but after I held more pages in my left hand than my right I don’t know if I liked this book at all. I was too distracted by the language that I couldn’t remember whether the previous questions were answered or not?
This is a few sample texts that didn’t sit right.
“The missionary call is about a burden to see hell-bound souls saved.”
“I bid you go and pull sinners out of the fire.”
“Develop a passion for reaching the lost heathens”
“50,000 pagans die everyday.” (I’ve also seen blogs to this dramatic affect with a ticking clock count-up of those who have died just since I have been reading this blog. For the record the while I was on the blog the counter was already up to 179) Is this suppose to instill some type of righteous frantic guilt?
I’m really not post-modern or only about liberation/social gospel. I think I fall in line with traditional protestant/evangelical thought (Bible is inspired Word of God, Jesus is both fully man and fully divine, Heaven and Hell are real). But if this how evangelicals speak of those we are trying to serve? Is this how we classify the sick, the broken, the poor? Is my job description to “pull sinners out of a lake of fire? If so I better start with myself. I don’t think I am wrong but I don’t refer to my target culture as hell-bound, pagans, heathens, and sinners on their way to a “lake of fire.”
On the other hand, I don’t want to diminish a real issue: What about those who have never heard? What about the fate of the unevangelized. Spiritual darkness and separation from God are real here in this world. These two texts frame the fate of the unreached in my mind.
God our Savior, who wants all men to be saved and to come to
knowledge of the truth. (I Timothy 2:3-4)
Salvation is found in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given to men
by which we must be saved. (Acts 4:12)
God wants all to be saved, but over 2 billion people in this world have never heard the Gospel message of Jesus Christ in a meaningful way. I think many Christian struggles to reconcile God’s wide mercy, yet simultaneous specific plan for salvation. And we keep struggling and grasping after texts like these. It’s a hard issue
How you reconcile these New Testament texts becomes manifest in your view of missions. Christians of all stripes have wrestled with the implications of the Great Commission in their own lives. You might ask what does “taking the Gospel to all nations” look like for me? Some go. Some support financially. Some go on short term missions. Some tutor a child. Some hand out gospel tracts. Some build a home with Habitat for Humanity. Some send. Some are dedicated Christian parents. Some ignore. Some make a great difference exactly where they are. Some are faithful deacons, greeters, elders and sunday school teachers in their church. Some pray fervently. Some feed the poor at soup kitchens. Some visit the sick and shut-ins. Some lead churches to support missions. Some don’t care. Some are deeply burdened.
So this issue of those who have never heard is real (they need to hear the Good News), but we ought to be careful what language we use to define them. The first step to define a group is to name it. Are they undocumented workers or illegal immigrants? Is the movement the pro-choice or pro-abortion. Are they pro-life or anti-reproductive choice? Are they bicycle commuters or speed bumps? And so it goes with each side seeking to win the argument by naming it in their favor.
So how do we define “those who don’t know his name”? Has it been tradition in the past to call them heathen, sinners, pagans, etc. If we stick with that type of language we promote an us/them, in/out, we got the info you need/you don’t mindset. Do we want to keep that mindset when we are told to not cast the first stone, to take the plank out of our own eye, and to know that while WE were yet sinners, Christ died for US. I think we can find better language.
In the end most language and metaphors (except for the Bible) fall short of his amazing love for us? I remember seeing a diagram with cliff on the left and a cliff on the right separated by a deep chasm bridged by a cross dropped in the middle? I remember hearing about a group of non swimmers in a lake needing a divine rescue floatation device? God decided to whom and when would that floatation device be flung. Then there is a middle school kid who deserved to fail with a 69 on his Algebra test..but the teacher rounds up to a passing grade to represent grace (a gift we don’t deserve)? A death row prisoner gets a heart transplant and pardon from the President in the 11th hour (to describe atonement)? I imagine a lot of these metaphors have really helped a lot of people.
I like the different ways some Christian writers are painting God’s saving grace for us.
A Navy SEAL was performing a covert operation, freeing hostages from a building in some dark part of the world. His friend’s team flew in by helicopter, made their way to the compound and stormed into the room where the hostages had been imprisoned for months. The room was filthy and dark. The hostages were curled up in a corner, terrified. When the SEALs entered the room, they heard the gasps of the hostages. They called to the prisoners telling them they were Americans. The SEALs asked the hostages to follow them, but the hostages wouldn’t. They sat there on the floor and hid their eyes in fear. They were not of healthy mind and didn’t believe their rescuers were really Americans. The SEAL’s stood there, not knowing what to do. They couldn’t possibly carry everybody out. One of the SEALs got an idea. He put down his weapon, took off his helmet, and curled up tightly next to the other hostages, getting so close his body was touching some of theirs. He softened the look on his face and put his arms around them. He was trying to show them he was one of them. None of the prison guards would have done this. He stayed there for a little while until some of the hostages started to look at him, finally meeting his eyes. The Navy SEAL whispered that they were Americans and were there to rescue them. Will you follow us? he said. The hostage stood to his feet...then another, until all of them were willing to go. (Donald Miller-- Blue Like Jazz)
I like this story and how God came and asked us to follow Him. But we were resistant and reluctant. Then He came down beside us like no other belief system or Religion talks of.
This is love: not that we loved God, but that he loved us and sent his Son as an atoning sacrifice for our sins. (1 John 4:10).
And He rescued us.
Is it reasonable for Mission Hospitals to operate such that patient fees are sufficient to cover all of the outgoing expenses? Or simply put, should mission hospital be able to financially stand on their own two feet without help from outside donations?
Yes.
Christian mission hospitals should and must stay afloat on their own via patient fees without depending upon outside donations. This is the only hope these hospitals have to last and provide any type of long term medical and spiritual impact on the community they serve.
First, it is quite reasonable to expect that missions hospitals can be self-sustainable because payroll is low compared to the West. Even for skilled workers like nurses, chaplains, and scrub technicians salaries of 250 dollars per month are very competitive.
Second, in some countries there is national health insurance. In Kenya as long as a patient is signed up for NHIF which costs less than 4 dollars per month all of their inpatient care and surgeries are paid for. The reimbursements to the hospital are substantial and can more than cover patient expenses.
Third, missionary doctors (who are free work and collect no salary) can not be counted on for the long term. This is not an insult against lack of commitment by the missionary community but the realities of Westerners living in the developing world. So many situations can arise including political instability, personal sickness, child-raising issues, lack of fund-raising, or change of mission focus are just a few reasons that may cause a sudden exit of a missionary doctor or the whole medical missionary staff. What happens and at what level can a mission hospital function if the missionaries leave? Mission hospitals must find a way to continue operating even if the missionary community leaves.
Forth, mission hospitals can not rely on donations of finances, medical instruments, and supplies to stay afloat. Donations are erratic for many reasons. Financial donations rise and fall with the wayward economy of the West. Some equipment is excellent and useable. Other instruments are too technical and fragile to last in a dusty, high-use developing world environment without medical tech support. Some donated instruments are just plain out of date or non-functional and put in the category we call, “Junk for Jesus.” Some donated items never arrive or are costly to import due to customs and taxes. Mission hospitals must find affordable streams of medical supplies in-country or in nearby places like India.
Fifth, mission hospital medical care in the developing world is often higher standard, more compassionate, and more expedient than the government hospitals. Certain patients will seek out the Mzungu (white) doctor for his or her expertise. Some of these patients are middle class, have white collar jobs, and are able to pay for “private attention.” Mission hospitals have a unique opportunity to capitalize off these “private” patients and charge fees that can subsidize the care for those patients that do not have the ability to pay.
No.
It is not reasonable nor should it be expected that a mission hospital could possibly be sustainable on patient fees alone. Christian Mission Hospitals need and should be propped up by donations and the care given by missionary doctors for many reasons.
First, the average Children’s Hospital in the USA relies on foundations and or donations at a rate of 30% of their overall budget. If we don’t expect a hospital in the West to stand alone, how can we possibly expect our counterpart here in Africa to make it without help from outside donations.
Second, operating a medical missions hospital is expensive. Much more so than discipleship, church planting, or building a seminary. It doesn’t make medical missions right or wrong, or better or worse just expensive. Operating rooms, medicine, staff available 24 hours per day it all makes this type of ministry expensive. To expect the meager fees to cover the operating expenses for things like hysterectomies, long term in-patient tuberculosis treatment, or out-patient medicines is not realistic.
Fourth, a noble goal of mission hospitals in nationalization. That is training the national staff (nurses, doctors, administrators, technicians) to take over key positions in the hospital thereby replacing the missionary staff. This is already happening at Kijabe. Many of the consultants doctors, all the nursing staff, the CEO, and all the residents are African. This is a good thing! But, no one wants to talk about the nasty hidden cost of nationalization of a mission hospital. Missionary doctors (who work for free) are replaced with national doctors (who must be paid a reasonable salary or see them leave). As mission hospitals become more nationalized they may rely further on donations to keep from sinking financially.
I guess yes & no is the answer to "should mission hospitals be self-sustainable." Likely, the right answer lies somewhere in between.
The University of Washington estimated there were 342,900 maternal deaths worldwide in 2008 and more than half of all maternal deaths were in only six countries in 2008 - India, Pakistan, Nigeria, Afghanistan, Ethiopia, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Our maternal mortality rate at Kijabe is lower than the national average, but in reality the data is scarce as most women still deliver at home with unskilled birth attendants.
We see between 60-80 women in GYN clinic each week and one of the most common chief complaints is infertility. What is the best help I can provide knowing childbirth is relatively unsafe? Women are far more likely to die giving birth then from infertility. Yet, these women will also be abandoned. Azia serves as good example. Married at 16 by arrangement in Somalia, she did not produce a child, so her husband took another wife and then finally divorced her at age 28. Her family promptly repeated the genital mutilation and returned her for her brothers to care for. Today she came for help. She wanted to know if she could have a surgery that would help her fertility so that she would be eligible again for marriage.
When she learned that I thought a myomectomy and tuboplasty would help her, she profusely kissed and hugged me. Her entire societal value depends on her ability to conceive. And when that is gone so is her hope and her future. It's not just that she wants to have a child, it's that she has to bear a child to have any value in society.